Research Article - (2018) Volume 8, Issue 4
Selected Aspects of Sense of Burden in Caregivers of Patients with Dementia Compared with Caregivers of Patients without Dementia
- Corresponding Author:
- Katarzyna Porzych
Department of Geriatrics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum, M. Curie Skłodowskiej 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
The aim of the study was to collect information on various aspects of the care burden in the group taking care of patients with dementia and those without dementia, to compare the intensity of care burden in both groups.
We interviewed a group of care givers of patients with and without dementia, with the Questionnaire of Sense of Burden. Respondents’ age ranged from 19 to 85 years. The study also analysed: gender, kinship of caregiver and patient, professional activity of caregivers, support from other family members, place of residence caregivers and patients, duration of residence with the patient, the amount of time spent with the patient during the day and the duration of the disease
There are important differences between caregivers who deal with patients with dementia and without dementia in the field of general level of burden of care (p<0.001), personal limitations (p=0.001), material and social limitations (p<0.001).
Based on the analysis of the means obtained by both groups, it can be assumed that the caregivers of people with dementia experience a greater care burden than the caregivers of people without dementia and the highest burden was related to ‘personal limitations’.
Dementia, Patients, Caregivers
According to GUS (‘GłównyUrządStatystyczny’ – Central Statistical Office of Poland), in December 2014 the share of the population aged 65 years and above in the total population of Poland in 2013 was 14.7%. Forecasts for the upcoming years are as follows: in 2020 - 18.9%, in 2035 - 24.5% and in 2050 - 32.7%. Life expectancy in 2010 was 75.85 years (men 71.88 years, women 80.06 years). Research on the prevalence of dementia in Poland presented that its prevalence in the population of people over 65 years of age ranges from 5.7% to 10% [1-3]. Based on the results of these studies the number of patients with dementia can be estimated at 300 000 to 500 000 .
In the United States of America current statistics estimate that in 2010 the number of people of 65 years and older diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease was 4.7 million, and in 2050 this number could grow almost threefold. European data show that Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias in Europe affect approximately 7.3 million people, and projections indicate that by 2020 this number is likely to double . These figures illustrate the scale of the problems posed by dementia and its prevalence in the world population and the need to expand activities aimed at holistic care of both patients and those involved in their care.
Quality of life of caregivers of patients with dementia depends on the influence of various factors, among which the leading one is care burden, understood as the dilemmas of psychological, social, material and physical nature, faced by the guardian. The theory of ‘caregiver burden’ was established in the early 80’s of XX century. In the literature two load factors are distinguished: subjective and objective . The first factor is defined as the accumulation of negative emotions leading to acute stress. The etiology of this phenomenon is related to the lack of rest, fatigue, exhaustion, depressed mood, a significant reduction of or breaking contact with family and friends, and inability to maintain and develop one’s own interests. Anger, shame and a sense of loss of control over one’s own time reappear and intensify, and consequently lead to a feeling of guilt and lower self-esteem. In turn, the objective loads appear due to the necessity of changes in the lives of caregivers, including their social relations, health condition and increased financial expenses [1,6].
The perception of the situation of patients with dementia and their caregivers as a general social challenge seems to be a priority in today’s world. Complexity of the problem requires the involvement of not only the Ministry of Health, but also multifaceted help [7,8]. First of all, it is necessary to awaken social awareness of the existence of this phenomenon. It has to be proven that education and holistic support to patients and people caring for them are essential.
The aim of the study was to broaden the knowledge of various aspects of the care burden of caregivers of patients with and without dementia as well as comparison of severity of care burden in the above mentioned groups.
Material and Methods
In the study, the questionnaire of Sense of Burden was used, the authors of which are: Ras et al. , and Ochudło et al. . The research took place in the multidisciplinary clinic ‘Bartodzieje’ in Bydgoszcz, in the Department of Geriatrics of Nicolaus Copernicus University Collegium Medicum, in the Bydgoszcz Association of Nursing Care of Alzheimer’s dementia, in the ‘Medic’ Clinic in Szubin and in the respondents’ homes. The study was conducted in a group of 141 caregivers, including 67 caregivers of patients without dementia and 74 caregivers of patients with dementia (Tables 1 and 2).
|Duration of living with patient||81||30.91||0.17||64.00||20.01||-0.22||-1.37|
|Number of hours spent with a patient daily||41||4.91||0.25||15.00||3.83||0.93||-0.17|
|Time from diagnosis (in years)||135||6.88||0.30||50.00||6.97||2.71||11.32|
Table 1: Descriptive statistics of socio demographic variables without grouping.
|Without dementia (N=67)||age||67||55.94||19.00||83.00||13.99||-0.77||0.17|
|Duration of living with patient||34||32.37||0.17||64.00||20.77||-0.37||-1.26|
|Number of hours||26||3.97||0.25||12.00||3.22||1.13||0.15|
|Time from diagnosis(in years)||63||8.62||0.30||50.00||8.39||2.36||8.70|
|With dementia (N=74)||age||64||59.98||28.00||85.00||13.76||-0.31||-0.51|
|Duration of living with patient||47||29.85||0.50||62.00||19.59||-0.13||-1.45|
|Number of hours||15||6.53||1.00||15.00||4.36||0.51||-0.89|
|Time from diagnosis(in years)||72||5.36||0.50||30.00||5.02||2.62||8.97|
Table 2: Descriptive statistics of socio demographic variables with grouping.
Caregivers’ age ranged from 19 to 85 years. Among the respondents taking care of people with dementia there were 57 women and 17 men, while in the group of respondents taking care of people without dementia - 57 women and 10 men. The largest group was children - 51.06%, then the spouses - 25.5%, others - 19.15% and siblings - 4.26%. In the study, 47.52% of the respondents were professionally active, while 52.48% stayedinactive. In the group of caregivers of people with dementia 32.43% of the respondents declared that they receive support, while in the group taking care of people without dementia this percentage amounted to 16.42%. Another variable analyzed was the time elapsed since diagnosis. In 10.64% it was less than one year, in 43.97% it ranged from 1 to 5 years, and in 41.13% - over 5 years. 4.26% of respondents were not able to submit the information. The proportion of caregivers living with patients in the group with dementia was 63.1% and in the group without dementia 39.9%.
Assessment of the reliability of components of sense of burden included in the questionnaire was made based on an analysis of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient; the values obtained (1 personal limitations – care burden 0.92; 2. material and social limitations 0.82; 3. negative emotions 0.69; 4. lack of energy- loss of control 0.66) confirm the indicators of the reliability of the questionnaire given by the authors .
The average value obtained in the surveyed in the overall sense of burden amounted to22.38; in the group of care givers of patients with dementia - 25.46, while among those taking care of patients without dementia – 18.99. Other descriptive statistics are presented in Table 3 and Table 4. Due to the different number of statements in particular scales weighted means for each scale were calculated to enable comparison of the results between these scales.In order to analyse the normal distribution, Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was performed. Factors 1-4 standardized results (based on weighted means - the sum obtained in the scale divided by the number of statements in this scale) (Table 5). After analyzing skewness and kurtosis, due to slight deviations from the normal distribution, parametric tests were used (Table 6).
|Burden (overall result)||22.38||3.00||50.00||10.95||0.28||-0.65|
|Raw results||Personal limitations||9.40||0.00||21.00||5.33||0.06||-0.78|
|Material and social limitations||6.01||0.00||15.00||3.88||0.44||-0.77|
|Lack of Energy||4.14||1.00||9.00||2.19||0.35||-0.68|
|Weighted means||Personal limitations||1.34||0.00||3.00||0.76||0.06||-0.78|
|Material and social limitations||1.20||0.00||3.00||0.78||0.44||-0.77|
|Lack of Energy||1.38||0.33||3.00||0.73||0.35||-0.68|
Table 3: Descriptive statistics of components of Questionnaire of Sense of Burden without grouping. The lowest care burden appears in ‘negative emotions’, while the highest one applies to ‘lack of energy’.
|Without dementia(N=67)||With dementia(N=74)|
|Burden (overall result)||18.99||3||50||10.35||0.77||0.5||25.46||5||47||10.64||-0.1||-0.77|
|Raw results||Personal limitations||7.79||0||21||5.19||0.29||-0.74||10.86||0||21||5.05||-0.11||-0.57|
|Material and social limitations||4.6||0||14||3.28||0.71||0.05||7.28||1||15||3.96||0.13||-1.09|
|Lack of Energy||3.63||1||9||2.04||0.44||-0.53||4.61||1||9||2.23||0.24||-0.81|
|Weighted means||Personal limitations||1.11||0||3||0.74||0.29||-0.74||1.55||0||3||0.72||-0.11||-0.57|
|Material and social limitations||0.92||0||2.8||0.66||0.71||0.05||1.46||0.2||3||0.79||0.13||-1.09|
|Lack of Energy||1.21||0.33||3||0.68||0.44||-0.53||1.54||0.33||3||0.74||0.24||-0.81|
Table 4: Descriptive statistics of components of the Questionnaire of Sense of Burden with grouping.
|Duration of living with patient||0||34||0.163||p>.20|
|Time from diagnosis (in years)||0||63||0.165||p<.10|
|General care burden||0||67||0.121||p>.20|
|Material and social limitations||0||67||0.154||p<.10|
|Lack of energy||0||67||0.131||p<.20|
|Duration of living with patient||1||47||0.153||p>.20|
|Time from diagnosis (in years)||1||72||0.237||p<.01|
|General care burden||1||74||0.076||p>.20|
|Material and social limitations||1||74||0.096||p>.20|
|Lack of energy||1||74||0.121||p>.20|
Table 5: Normality tests applying to the data included in the Questionnaire of Sense of Burden.
|Without dementia (N=67)||Dementia (N=74)||t||P||Ratio F Variance||P Variance|
|General care burden||18.99||10.35||25.46||10.64||-3.66||0.000||1.06||0.82|
|Material and social limitations||4.60||3.28||7.28||3.96||-4.36||0.000||1.46||0.12|
|Lack of energy||3.63||2.04||4.61||2.23||-2.72||0.007||1.19||0.46|
Table 6: The significance of differences between groups in terms of general feeling of care burden and its components.
On average, the overall care burden care in caregivers of patients with dementias was higher than in caregivers of those without dementias. The carried out analysis show that in both groups the highest burden was related to ‘personal limitations’, then ‘material and social limitations’, ‘lack of energy’ and ‘negative emotions’. However, the caregivers of patients with dementia had significantly higher levels of a sense of burden in terms of ‘general level of care burden’, ‘personal limitations’ and ‘social and material limitations’. No statistically significant difference between the compared groups in terms of ‘negative emotions’ and ‘lack of energy’ was noted.
The results confirm multifaceted negative consequences of dementia syndromes for families and caregivers of patients. In our study, the overall care burden in the group of those taking care of patients with dementias was 25.46. Consistent results (25.5) were presented by Szewczyczak et al. . Slightly lower results (18.6) were obtained in the study of Ochudło et al. . Schneider et al. in the study conducted among 280 caregivers from 14 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland, Luxembourg, Portugal, Sweden, Great Britain, Italy) demonstrated that the level of burden associated with performed care was similar in particular countries and reached a high value . Other reports from the world literature confirm that in the subjective perception of caregivers of patients with dementia, incurred physical and psychological costs are high [11,12].
Similar problems are faced by caregivers of people suffering from chronic disease other than dementia. The most important stress factors include: economic and time constraints, temporary deterioration of caregivers’ health, reduced professional and social activity [13-15].
International data from the literature show that caregivers of the chronically ill, regardless of the nature of the disease, do not receive sufficient support. Therefore, it is necessary to raise public awareness and create a variety of support systems for families and caregivers of patients [11,12,14].
Important differences between caregivers who deal with patients with dementia and without dementia in the field of ‘general level of care burden’, ‘personal limitations’ and ‘social and material limitations’ were demonstrated. There were no statistically significant differences between the compared groups in terms of ‘negative emotions’ and ‘lack of energy’.
Based on the analysis of means obtained by particular groups it was presented that caregivers of people with dementia experience a greater care burden than the caregivers of people without dementia.
However, in both groups care of a patient modifies a previous lifestyle of the guardian.
- Ras P, Opala G, Ochudlo S. Questionnaire to feel the burden of people caring for patients with dementia - A new research tool : Polish. Psychogeriatr. Pol 2(1), 21-32 (2005).
- Central Statistical Office of Poland. The demographic situation of older people and the consequences of the aging of the Polish population in the light of the forecast for years 2014-2050. Central Statistical Office of Poland. Inform. Portal (2014).
- Szczudlik A. The situation of people with Alzheimer's disease in Poland. RPO report. Commissioner for Human Rights. Age. Ageing. Rep (2014).
- Waligórska M, Kostrzewa Z, Potyra M, et al. PopulationProjection 2014-2050. Central Statistical Office of Poland. Inform. Portal (2014).
- Cialkowska, Kuzminska M, Kasprzak M. The burden of carers as a factor of delegating care to psychogeriatric institutions. Psychogeriatr. Pol 9(2), 69-76 (2012).
- Kłoszewska I, Kwiecińska E. Relationships between the mental state and the level of functioning of demented people and the sense of "burden" of their caregivers. Psychogeriatr 1(1), 59-66 (1998).
- Bien B, Wojsztel ZB, Doroszkiewicz H. The level of disability of elderly people as an indication to support family caregivers. Gerontol. Pol 16(1), 25-43 (2008).
- Ochudlo S, Targosz M, Liberska A, et al. Feeling burden on caregivers of people with advanced forms of Alzheimer's disease. Neurol. Neurosurg. Poland 39(4), 354-358 (2005).
- Szewczyczak M, Adryan E, Stachowska M, et al. Family burden in caring for a patient with Alzheimer's disease. Nurs. Prob 20(2), 223-227 (2012).
- Schneider J, Murray J, Banerjee S, et al. Euro care: A cross national study of co-resident spouse careers for people with Alzheimer’s disease: I- Factors associated with career burden. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr 14(8), 651-661 (1991).
- Mohamed S, Rosenheck R, Lyketsos CG, et al. Caregiver burden in Alzheimer disease: Cross-Sectional and longitudinal patient correlates. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr 18(10), 917-927 (2010).
- Springate BA, Tremont G. Dimensions of caregiver burden in dementia: impact of demographic, mood, and care recipient variables. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr 22(3), 294-300 (2014).
- Cramm JM, Strating MM, Nieboer AP. Satisfaction with care as a quality-of-life predictor for stroke patients and their caregivers. Qual. Life. Res 21(10), 1719-1725 (2012).
- Grochowska J. The feeling of satisfaction and the burden of the duties of informal carers of the elderly depending on the level of fitness of the pupils. General. Med. Health. Sci 20(1), 46-50 (2014).
- Kosinska M, Kulagowska E, Niebroj L, et al. Loads of carers of people qualified for long-term home care. Environ. Med 16(2), 59-68 (2013).