Research Article - Neuropsychiatry (2016) Volume 6, Issue 6

Hemispheric differences for visual P3 amplitude in patients with schizophrenia

Corresponding Author:
Dr. Shahrzad Mazhari
Department of Psychiatry, Kerman Neuroscience Research Center, Jahad Blvd. Ebn Sina Avenue, P.O. Box: 76175-113, Kerman, Iran
Tel: +98-341-2264196
Fax: +98-341-2264198
Email: Smazhari@kmu.ac.ir, Mazharis2012@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective:

While reduced amplitude of visual P3 event related potential has been reported in patients with schizophrenia, little is known about visual P3 asymmetry. The present study aimed to investigate the presence and pattern of lateralization of the P3 component in a group of patients with schizophrenia.

Methods:

ERPs were recorded in 25 patients and 26 control individuals, using a simple visual oddball discrimination task.

Results:

Patients with schizophrenia showed overall P3 reductions, as well as asymmetry of P3 amplitude, with smaller P3 amplitude over the left parietal electrode.

Conclusion: This finding may reflect abnormalities of a generator located in the left parietal lobe in patients with schizophrenia.

Keywords

Schizophrenia, Hemispheric difference, Asymmetry, ERP

Introduction

Abnormal patterns of brain activity are demonstrated in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia [1,2]. Such abnormalities have been found in structural and functional brain imaging, as well as in cognitive functions involving attention [3,4]. More specifically, hemispheric amplitude asymmetry for auditory P3 ERP component has been reported in these patients [5-8]; however, little is known about lateralization of visual P3 ERPs. The aim of this study was to examine the presence and pattern(s) of visual P3 ERPs among schizophrenic patients.

One of the best known cognitive ERP components is the P3. The p3 response is divided into two sub-components, namely P3a, and P3b. Different task conditions determine P3 scalp topography, which implies overlapping neural activations are involved, with initial frontal/central P3a and subsequent parietal P3b emerging [9]. The paradigm usually is used to record P3b is the two-stimulus oddball paradigm, which involves the presentation of two distinct stimuli with differing occurrence rates. Individuals are asked to discriminate the infrequent target stimulus from the frequent standard stimulus. The P3b elicited by the target stimulus is a large positive wave with maximum amplitude over the parietal electrodes [9].

Reduced P3 amplitude in response to auditory oddball tasks is among the most replicated findings in patients with schizophrenia [10]. Some studies have demonstrated a similar finding of lower P3 amplitude in visual oddball tasks, while others have found no distinct differences between patients and controls [11,12]. In addition to a general finding of reduced P3 amplitude, differences in P3 topography have been reported in schizophrenia. Studies have found hemispheric amplitude differences in the auditory P3, with a smaller P3 distributed over the left temporal region, occurring in first episode, chronically ill and off-medication schizophrenia patients [13-15]. Jeon and Polish conducted a meta-analysis which supported the presence of reduced amplitude of auditory P3 in the left hemisphere of schizophrenic patients [6]. Furthermore, left temporal scalp P3 amplitude reductions have been found to be highly correlated with severity of positive symptoms and concomitant left temporal cortical gray matter loss [7,16]. Finally, it is suggested that left-sided P3 reductions in schizophrenics could reflect abnormalities of a ‘generator’ located in the left superior temporal gyrus [5,14,15].

Despite the large body of evidence for auditory P3 amplitude asymmetry in schizophrenia, only a few studies have examined hemispheric amplitude differences in visual P3. Pfefferbaum et al. compared topographic distribution of visual P3 in schizophrenia patients taking maintenance medications versus those not taking maintenance medications. They found no differences in P3 ERPs distributions between members of the two groups [12].

The present study was designed to examine the presence and pattern of lateralization of the P3b component in response to a visual oddball task in a group of schizophrenic patients. In a simple oddball discrimination task standard stimuli were presented unilaterally and target stimuli were presented bilaterally. Bilateral stimuli presentation was used, in which both hemispheres receive stimulus information directly and simultaneously. To evaluate ERP scalp distribution changes, early (N1) and late visual processing (P3b) waves in two homologous cerebral hemisphere sites were measured. Exploring of lateral differences for P3b ERP components might help to better understanding of impairment in information processing among schizophrenic patients.

Methods

▪ Participants

A group of 25 patients with schizophrenia (20Male) was recruited from outpatients of a psychiatric hospital. All patients met DSM-IV criteria for a life time diagnosis of schizophrenia. Patients were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia [17], and received their antipsychotic medications at the time of testing. The mean chlorpromazine (CPZ) equivalent dose was 369.2 mg [18]. Patients did not have a history of electroconvulsive therapy within six months prior to the testing time.

The control group comprised 26 individuals (20Male) screened for a personal and family history of psychotic illnesses. Inclusion criteria for all participants were age between 18 and 45 years, being right handed and having normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Exclusion criteria included a history of head injury, neurological disorders, and current substances abuse. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

Experimental procedure

▪ Oddball task

Participants were seated in an electrically shielded and sound-attenuating room, with a head rest in front of a computer screen. The stimuli were white circles presented on a black computer screen. Each trial started with the presentation of a fixation point for 500 ms at the center of a computer screen. Then, circles briefly appeared (70-140 ms) in one or two locations at the corners of an imaginary square centered on the fixation point. On trials with frequent stimuli circles appeared at the left or right of the visual field. On trials with infrequent stimuli (target) circles were presented bilaterally. A total of 320 frequent stimuli (80%) and 80 target stimuli (20%) were presented in a random order. The time between the onsets of two trials was 2.5 or 3 seconds. Participants sat 60 cm from the computer screen. They were asked to fixate at the center of the screen and to press a right or left button as quickly and accurately as possible, whenever a unilateral or bilateral display was detected.

▪ ERP acquisition

The experimental apparatus consisted of a Mitsar-202 system (Mitsar, Russia) and WinEEG program developed at the Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences. The EEG was recorded using a 32 channel cap (Electro-Cap International, Inc.), and referenced to linked earlobes. Electrode impedance was kept below 5 kOhm. EEG was sampled at 500 Hz with filtered online 16-30 Hz band pass. The ground electrode was attached to the vertex. Ocular artifacts correction was performed using an independent component analysis approach. Movement artifacts were excluded from analysis by careful visual inspection of the raw EEG. After final artifact rejection, ERPs were averaged relative to stimulus onset, including 200 ms prestimulus to 800 ms post-stimulus. The N100 was defined as the largest negative wave 100 -150 ms after stimulus onset and The P300 as the largest positive wave following the N100–P200–N200 complex between 250 and 700 ms after stimulus onset at the P3, Pz, and P4 electrodes. The peak latency was defined as the time from stimulus onset to the maximum peak.

▪ Statistical analyses

A generalized linear model (GLM) for repeated measures was used to test for group (schizophrenia vs. controls) differences on the dependent variables (target amplitude & latency) across the two trials (frequent, infrequent stimuli) (within-subject factor). Significant main effects, interaction, and follow-up pairwise comparisons were examined after adjustment for multiple testing (Bonferroni). A combination of chi-square and t-test was used on demographic and clinical data. All analyses were conducted using SPSS 16.0.

Results

Table 1 presents the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients and controls. The two groups were well matched for age, gender, education, and hand preference.

  Patients
N=25
Controls
N=26
  p
Age (year)
Education (year)
Sex-N(% males)
Edinburgh
Length  of illness (year)
Age onset of illness (year)
Mean chlorpromazine
equivalent (mg)
PANS (+)
PANS (-)  
33.8 (8.2)
11.2 (2)
20(80%)
98.6 (7.2)
12.3 (6.3)
21.4 (5.9) 369.2 (151.5)
8.1(4)
11.6 (6.9)
34.4 (8.8)
11.7 (2.2)
20(77%)
98.3 (5.4)
NS
NS
NS
NS

Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.

Both groups performed task over 95% accurate, the schizophrenia group (M=%95.1, SD=4.7) were significantly less accurate than control group (M = %97.9, SD = 1.9), (P=0.004). Moreover, the patients performed significantly slower (M=601.5, SD=176.3) than controls (M = 484, SD = 73.0), (p=0.004). Mean ERP amplitudes and latencies for each group are presented in Table 2.

  P3 Pz   P4                        Ƥ
N1 amplitude   Patient Control -4.4(1.9)  -6.9(4.4) -3.1(1.4) -4.9(4.0)  -3.1(1.5)             0.001   -4.8(3.8)            0.001
N1 latency      Patient   Control 138.4(26.0) 145.1(22.0)  138.4(34.0)  138.8(30.0)   145.3(28.0)        0.1   145.8(26.0)        0.8
P3b amplitude    Patient  Control 5.1(4.2) 8.8(5.0)  6.9(4.1)  10.3(5.1)    6.1(4.3)             0.01    8.5(5.0)             0.5
 P3b latency      Patient   control 392.3(71.4) 387.8(65.3)  381.8(64.3)  372.8(80.7)    384.9(74.0)       0.3    386.4(71.3)       0.8

Table 2: Mean ERP amplitudes and latencies for each participant group in parietal electrodes.

For N1 amplitude, the model showed a significant main effect of group (F1,49=6.3; P=0.015; η2=0.6). Schizophrenia patients had significantly smaller mean N100 amplitudes, for targets on all electrodes compared to controls. The main effect of N1 amplitude was significant (F1,49=36; P<0.001; η2=1) and N1 was larger on P3 than P4 electrode in two groups. The interaction effect between electrode and group was not significant (F1,49=1.3; P=0.2; η2=0.2), indicating that both groups similarly had larger N1 amplitudes over the left parietal than right parietal electrodes.

For P3b amplitude, the results showed a significant main effect of group (F1,49=5.7; P=0.02; η2=0.6) and patients had significantly smaller mean P3b amplitudes for target stimuli on all electrodes compared to controls (all P<0.02).The interaction effect between electrode and group was significant (F1,49=4.7; P=0.034; η2=0.5), indicating different changes in amplitude among electrodes between the two groups. Post hoc analysis showed that there was a significant amplitude differences between the P3 and P4 electrodes in patients (P = 0.017), and P3b amplitude was smaller on P3 electrode than on P4 electrode, however no difference was found between the two electrodes in controls (P=0.5) (Figure 1).The grand average ERP waveforms for the target stimulus at each electrode position are shown in Figure 2.

neuropsychiatry-amplitude-group

Figure 1: Mean peak P3b amplitude for each participant group.

neuropsychiatry-target-parietal

Figure 2: Grand average event-related potentials from the target stimuli for parietal electrodes for both groups.

To examine the effects of patient characteristics on P3b asymmetry, correlation coefficients (Pearson’s r) were calculated between left P3b amplitude (P3 electrode) with chlorpromazine equivalent dose, duration of disease, and PANSS scores. The results showed that the left P3b amplitude was not associated with the chlorpromazine equivalent dose and disease characteristics (all P>0.6).

Discussion

The present study aimed to examine whether the P3b component from a visual oddball task was laterally asymmetric in a group of schizophrenic patients, using a simple oddball discrimination task. In agreement with previous studies, schizophrenic patients exhibited smaller N1 and P3b responses to the targets in comparison to controls at parietal electrodes (P3, Pz, P4). Moreover, P3b amplitude from a visual oddball task was smaller over the left parietal than right parietal electrodes (P3 asymmetry) for target stimulus, whereas the healthy control did not show this asymmetry. Our finding extends and supports P3 studies that used auditory stimuli and reported significant left temporal area reductions of auditory P3 in patients with schizophrenia. They explained that the observed amplitude reduction might be due to larger structural deficits in left compared to right temporal areas, particularly volume reduction in the left superior temporal gyrus [5,14,15].

Although we cannot inference the underlying sources for the P3 amplitude asymmetry from this study, this effect might originate from primary electrophysiological, structural, or cognitive differences between the two hemispheres in patients.

Our study showed that the maximal statistical differences between schizophrenia and controls were localized to the left parietal scalp region. A possible explanation for our findings of left –sided deficits in patients might be lateralized pathology in the generators of P3b, predominantly a generator located in the parietal lobe. Previous studies have revealed that P3b from target stimuli was correlated with parietal area size [9,19]. Particularly, Bledowski et al. found two parietal regions, the intra parietal lobe (IPL) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC), contributed to the visual P3b component [20]. Interestingly, parietal lobe abnormalities, particularly IPL and PPC, have been found in structural and functional imaging studies of schizophrenia [21,22].

It should be noted that studies suggest that the pathology of schizophrenia involves multi focal diffuse abnormalities of brain structure and function, not a single or specific localized abnormality. Particularly, abnormality in a distributed network including the frontal lobe and parietal lobe, such as prefrontal-parietal functional disconnection is proposed [23]. Thus, our result of reduced P3b over left parietal areas might reflect disruption of widespread neural networks including the parietal lobe in schizophrenia [24].

Neuropsychological studies in healthy individuals have emphasized the role of the parietal lobe in several cognitive processes like attention, perception, memory, and motor planning, which have also found to be impaired in schizophrenia [25]. Future research is required to investigate whether abnormalities in P3b asymmetry over the left parietal area is associated with cognitive dysfunctions in schizophrenia or not.

Our results showed that patients had significantly smaller P3b amplitude than controls in all parietal electrodes. It should be noted that the p3 activity recorded from one electrode is dependent on the activity recorded from neighboring electrodes. Midline (Pz) voltage reflects the summed activity of both right and left parietal fields (P3 and P4 electrodes). Therefore, midline reduction of P3b in our patients could be at least partly explained by abnormality in one or two nearby electrical fields, which was mainly the left parietal field.

Our findings showed that P3b amplitude did not correlate with clinical symptoms and chlorpromazine equivalent dose, suggesting P3b asymmetry was independent of medication effect and clinical symptoms.

Reductions of P3b amplitudes over the left parietal lobe might be one of the underlying physiological processes involved in schizophrenia. Future research is needed to replicate this finding and examine left-sided P3b amplitude deficit in individuals who share some genetic vulnerabilities with schizophrenia such as schizotypal personality and first-degree relatives of patients.

Our results showed that schizophrenia patients had smaller N1 amplitude than controls, though they did not exhibit asymmetry in N1 amplitude. This finding indicates that asymmetry in visual ERP components, presents at late-cognitive related components but not at early sensoryevoked component such as N1.

Limitations

Some limitations of the study should be mentioned. First, all patients were taking their medication, which might have affected the results. However, chlorpromazine equivalent doses were not significantly correlated with P3b amplitude, making any potential effect of medication on the finding unlikely. Second, the patient group was recruited mainly from an outpatient clinic and showed mild symptoms, thus they may not exactly represent individuals typically encountered in clinical practice or examined in previous schizophrenia studies, which may limit the generalizability of these findings.

Conclusion

In summary, P3b amplitude elicited by a simple visual oddball task was smaller over the left parietal electrodes in schizophrenic patients, suggesting both midline and lateral electrode placements are necessary to provide reliable differences between patients and controls. Moreover, these lateralized amplitude effects may originate from asymmetric electrophysiological processes that govern attention operations on target stimuli.

References